"If the team doesn't win, nobody wins:" A team-level analysis of pay and performance relationships in Major League Baseball.

by Nicholas Miceli

Abstract

This analysis of team-level major league baseball performance, for the 1985 through 2001 seasons, addresses four questions: (1) “Is there a relationship between winning and performance?” (2) “Is there a relationship between pay and performance?” (3) “Is there a relationship between winning and pay?” and (4) “Is there interaction between batting and pitching?” The findings are that: (1) the relationship between performance and winning is significant. Pitching explains 2/3 of the variance, with batting covering the other 1/3; (2) the pay and performance relationship is significant, but the practical importance of the relationships is low, because non-performance factors exert stronger influence on pay levels; (3) the pay and winning relationship is significant, but becomes non-significant when performance variables are used to predict winning; and (4) the batting and pitching interaction is significant, but weak, with limited effects. This type of analysis should help teams be managed more effectively than may presently be the case.

Bio

Nicholas S. Miceli, Ph.D. (University of Oklahoma, 1996) is an Associate Professor of Business at Concord University in Athens, WV. His primary research interest is in human resource management, and the use of sports statistics to test human resource management theory (e.g., compensation, selection, recruiting, etc.). His secondary field of research is occupational health and the epidemiology of workplace related injuries and illnesses.

Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License